whats up with that.com about the alleged emails and what the scientists said.

Even Australia’s Blogs Crikey picked up on the story.

Rebuttal from Real Climate.org saying that the suspect emails and data are just a diversion from “Global Warming” naysayers seeking to publicize their no “global warning climate change” agenda. Posts and +900 comments for 20 and 23 nov right after the “hoax” email break in.

To me it looks like some of the “human” (anthropogenic) caused global warming stats were manipulated by naysayers (to global warming) just to make the “science” of the data and reporting procedures look really, really, bad.

There is no global warming, the sky is not falling, but tons of other resources and reputable scientists dismiss this “break in” as old news.

Some of the emails and information (if not altered and are genuine) are over 10 years old and do not reflect reputable current statistics and fact gathering, by diverse independent worldwide experts that use data that is taken from other than “peer reviewed” resources. (i.e. “closed” resources). National Meteriological Services in the USA and other governments, do not release the best factual data because it is a “National Security” issue…

Who do you believe??